Nonverbal communication and rituals in intercultural friendship development
A three-semester longitudinal study at a Chinese university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/1mw64w10Keywords:
Nonverbal communication, intercultural friendships, cultural rituals, Third Culture Building, emotional regulationAbstract
This longitudinal study explores the roles of nonverbal communication and cultural rituals in the development of intercultural friendships between Chinese and international students at a Chinese university. Spanning three semesters, the research investigates how students navigate cultural differences using nonverbal strategies such as silence, body language, proxemics, and shared rituals like gift-giving and communal meals. Findings show that nonverbal communication is essential for building trust, managing conflict, and regulating emotions. Silence is used for emotional reset and conflict avoidance, while shared rituals create a "third culture" that transcends cultural boundaries. The study extends symbolic interactionism by incorporating embodied nonverbal rituals and reinterpreting Face Negotiation Theory to demonstrate how these rituals function as facework. The concept of "third culture building" highlights how intercultural friendships evolve into shared cultural spaces. The results emphasize the importance of informal, student-driven practices and recommend that universities support these nonverbal strategies to foster inclusive environments.
References
Anjum, S. W., Jinquan, W., Fu, W., & Ye, Z. (2025). The silent language of connection. Journal of International Students, 15(10), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.32674/82x7j075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/82x7j075
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Charon, J. M. (2009). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration (9th ed.). Pearson.
De Hooge, I. E., & Straeter, L. M. (2023). Don’t tell me you are sorry with a gift: The negative consequences of apology gifts. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103144
Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Gutema, D. M., Pant, S. K. C., & Nikou, S. (2023). Exploring key themes and trends in international student mobility research — A systematic literature review. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(3), 843-861. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-05-2023-0195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2023-0195
Jurések, M., & Wawrosz, P. (2024). What does ‘Having close friends from abroad’ mean for the intercultural competencies: A new view on the antecedents of cultural intelligence. Social Sciences, 13(11), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110569
Li, Y. (2025). A cross cultural comparison of nonverbal communication between China and the United States. OALib, 12(07), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113842
McNamara, R. A. (2024). Cultural evolution of religion, spirituality and ritual: Impacts on human cooperation. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 76, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-024-00937-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-024-00937-3
Nakane, I. (2007). Silence in intercultural communication: Perceptions and performance. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.166
Pang, H. T., Zhou, X., & Chu, M. (2024). Cross cultural differences in using nonverbal behaviors to identify indirect replies. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-024-00454-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-024-00454-z
Tang, L., & Zhang, C. (2023). Intercultural friendships with international students in China: Examining the role of intergroup contact, intercultural communication competence, host country nationals’ attitudes, and perceived intergroup threats. Behavioral Sciences, 13(10), 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100855
Ting Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–235). Sage.
Wong, M. L. L., & Liu, S. (2025). “Who is my friend?”: The meaning and value of intercultural friendship for Chinese international students during acculturation in Malaysia. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 108, 102266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102266
Wu, B., Afzaal, M., & Abdel Salam El-Dakhs, D. (2025). “However, his silence said volumes”: A pragmatic analysis of conversational silence in rapport management. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2451490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2451490
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syed Waqas Anjum, Wang Jinquan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
