Mapping the technology acceptance curve
A new conceptual framework for educators in times of rapid change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/tn19dq65Keywords:
Technology adoption, educators, Kübler-Ross Change Curve, Technology Acceptance Model, Change ManagementAbstract
This paper probes the theoretical basis of the Kübler-Ross model and the Technological Acceptance Curve model and conjoins the two models to propose the Technology Acceptance Curve Model that maps the technology adoption journey of educators in these rapidly changing times. The fundamental concepts of these models entail different ways to achieve similar goals of adoption, while the former evaluates the emotional journey, the latter a perceptive one. Combining these would enable capturing the entire technology adoption spectrum, thereby including both the emotional journey till technological acceptance and extending it to final adoption. The proposed model can serve as a key framework to understand how successful technological adoption looks beyond functional aspects and includes emotive and perceptive aspects.
References
Al-Emran, M., & Granić, A. (2021). Is It Still Valid or Outdated? A Bibliometric Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model and Its Applications From 2010 to 2020. In M. Al-Emran & K. Shaalan (Eds.), Recent Advances in Technology Acceptance Models and Theories (Vol. 335, pp. 1–12). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64987-6_1
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
AlManei, M., Salonitis, K., & Tsinopoulos, C. (2018). A conceptual lean implementation framework based on change management theory. Procedia Cirp, 72, 1160–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.141
Armitage, C. J. (2009). Is there utility in the transtheoretical model? British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X368991
Bagga, S. K., Gera, S., & Haque, S. N. (2023). The mediating role of organizational culture: Transformational leadership and change management in virtual teams. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 120–131.
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Nathan DeWall, C., & Liqing Zhang. (2007). How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301033
Bhattacherjee, A., & Park, S. C. (2014). Why end-users move to the cloud: A migration-theoretic analysis. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.1
Boonstra, A. (2024). Change management for digital transformation. In A Research Agenda for Digital Transformation (pp. 227–254). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781035306435/book-part-9781035306435-16.xml
Conceição, S. C. O. (2006). Faculty Lived Experiences in the Online Environment. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106292247
Corr, C. A. (2021). Should We Incorporate the Work of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross in Our Current Teaching and Practice and, If So, How? OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 83(4), 706–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222819865397
Darban, M., & Polites, G. L. (2016). Do emotions matter in technology training? Exploring their effects on individual perceptions and willingness to learn. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 644–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.028
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dennison, J. (2024). Emotions: Functions and significance for attitudes, behaviour, and communication. Migration Studies, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnad018
Deonna, J. A. (2006). Emotion, Perception and Perspective. Dialectica, 60(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2005.01031.x
Dhilla, S. J. (2017). The role of online faculty in supporting successful online learning enterprises: A literature review. Higher Education Politics & Economics, 3(1), 136–155. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1207984
Dumin, L. (2025). Preparing Students to Live and Work in an AI-Driven World: Ideas for Educators and Students. In Teaching and Learning in the Age of Generative AI. Routledge.
Dunning, J. M. (2019). Professional superheroes: Are changes in higher education stretching hospitality management academics’ professionalism to the limit? Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 25, 100200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100200
Dwivedi, Y. K., Wade, M. R., & Schneberger, S. L. (2012). Information systems theory: Explaining and predicting our digital society, vol. 1.
Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C., & Bello, A. O. (2019). Determinants of dynamic process of emerging ICT adoption in SMEs–actor network theory perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(1), 2–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2018-0019
Geertshuis, S., & Liu, Q. (2022). The challenges we face: A professional identity analysis of learning technology implementation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(2), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1832904
Giray, L. (2025). “Death of the Old Teacher”: Navigating AI in Education Through Kubler-Ross Model. ECNU Review of Education, 20965311251319049. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311251319049
Granić, A. (2022). Educational Technology Adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Gumaelius, L., Skogh, I.-B., Matthíasdóttir, Á., & Pantzos, P. (2024). Engineering education in change. A case study on the impact of digital transformation on content and teaching methods in different engineering disciplines. European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(1), 70–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2285794
Hiatt, J.M. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci Research.
Huang, J., Matthews, K. E., & Lodge, J. M. (2022). ‘The university doesn’t care about the impact it is having on us’: Academic experiences of the institutionalisation of blended learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5), 1557–1571. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1915965
Kelley, M. M. (2010). Grief: Contemporary theory and the practice of ministry. Fortress Press.
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106
Kennerley, M., Neely, A., & Adams, C. (2003). Survival of the fittest: Measuring performance in a changing business environment. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(4), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040310509304
Kent, A. M., & Giles, R. M. (2017). Preservice Teachers’ Technology Self-Efficacy. Srate Journal, 26(1), 9–20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1134392.pdf
Kim, H.-W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650309
Klein, A. (2024, February 28). Top 13 Reasons Teachers Avoid ChatGPT and Other AI Tools. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/technology/top-13-reasons-teachers-avoid-chatgpt-and-other-ai-tools/2024/02
Kotter, J. (1995). Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 55-67.
Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On Death and Dying. Scribner. https://www.perlego.com/book/778497/on-death-and-dying-pdf
Langreo, L. (2024). Most Teachers Are Not Using AI. Here’s Why; All the hype around AI in education is not translating into the technology transforming instruction. Education Week, 43(15). https://www.edweek.org/technology/most-teachers-are-not-using-ai-heres-why/2024/01
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Molino, M., Cortese, C. G., & Ghislieri, C. (2020). The promotion of technology acceptance and work engagement in industry 4.0: From personal resources to information and training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2438. 10.3390/ijerph17072438
Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during Covid-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability, 12(15), 5911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155911
Moran, J. W., & Brightman, B. K. (2001). Leading organizational change. Career Development International, 6(2), 111–119.
Niedenthal, P. M., & Wood, A. (2019). Does emotion influence visual perception? Depends on how you look at it. Cognition and Emotion, 33(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1561424
Palmer, S., White, R., & Holt, D. (2007). Conceptions of teaching with integrity online in higher education: A case in the field of engineering. EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 2603–2612. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/25739/
Phillips, J., & Klein, J. D. (2023). Change Management: From Theory to Practice. TechTrends, 67(1), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00775-0
Roling, W. M., Schüffler, A. S., Thim, C., Grum, M., Gronau, N., & Kluge, A. (2023). Human behavior in the context of continuous change-an exploratory analysis in a research and application center industry 4.0. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/c840c0f8-6293-48d2-95d6-c1a835f0cfca
Ruloff, M., & Petko, D. (2025). School principals’ educational goals and leadership styles for digital transformation: Results from case studies in upper secondary schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 28(2), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2014979
Saghafian, M., Laumann, K., & Skogstad, M. R. (2021). Stagewise overview of issues influencing organizational technology adoption and use. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 630145. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630145
Satpute, A. B., Nook, E. C., Narayanan, S., Shu, J., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2016). Emotions in “Black and White” or Shades of Gray? How We Think About Emotion Shapes Our Perception and Neural Representation of Emotion. Psychological Science, 27(11), 1428–1442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616661555
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Schüffler, A. S., Thim, C., Haase, J., Gronau, N., & Kluge, A. (2020). Information Processing in Work Environment 4.0 and the Beneficial Impact of Intentional Forgetting on Change Management. Zeitschrift Für Arbeits- Und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 64(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000307
Smaldone, M. C., & Uzzo, R. G. (2013). The Kubler-Ross model, physician distress, and performance reporting. Nature Reviews Urology, 10(7), 425–428. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.76
Sotelo, B., & Livingood, R. A. (2018). A qualitative case study for technology acceptance using TAM and the kübler-ross models. In Technology Adoption and Social Issues: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 664–674). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/a-qualitative-case-study-for-technology-acceptance-using-tam-and-the-kbler-ross-models/196698
Taylor, D., Bearman, M., Scarparo, S., & Thomas, M. K. E. (2022). The emotional transition to online teaching: Grief, loss, and implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 27(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2022.2083141
Thompson, N. (2012). Grief and its challenges. A profound lesson for the living. Life, 67(21), 36–43. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000793798528128
Tsang, E. W. K., & Zahra, S. A. (2008). Organizational unlearning. Human Relations, 61(10), 1435–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708095710
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Vlachopoulos, D. (2021). Organizational change management in higher education through the lens of executive coaches. Education Sciences, 11(6), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060269
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029
Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Lai, K.-W. (2018). Developing an understanding of the impact of digital technologies on teaching and learning in an ever-changing landscape. In Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 3–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_113
Wang, Y. (2007). On the cognitive processes of human perception with emotions, motivations, and attitudes. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), 1(4), 1–13. 10.4018/jcini.2007100101
Zadra, J. R., & Clore, G. L. (2011). Emotion and perception: The role of affective information. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2(6), 676–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.147
Zell, D. (2003). Organizational Change as a Process of Death, Dying, and Rebirth. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886303039001004
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sourav Choudhury, Chandrabhanoo Chakrabarti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) [year] [author]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Call for Special Issue Proposals 






