Elementary science teaching
Actions, dispositions, and decisions that shape learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/8j7hjk26Keywords:
Disposition, Pedagogical practices, Science education, Classroom observation, PakistanAbstract
Instructional decision-making process is inherently complex, involving reasoning, choices, and dispositions that shape classroom practices. Science teachers’ pedagogical actions and decisions are influenced by multiple factors, ranging from intrinsic beliefs to external constraints. This study explores the interplay of actions, dispositions, and decision-making in various teaching and learning strategies used in science classrooms. Using classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with 16 elementary science teachers from a nationwide mixed-methods study, we examine their instructional approaches. Findings indicate that most teachers rely on traditional methods, such as ‘chalk-and-talk’ or text-based instruction, with their pedagogical strategies being predominantly discipline-oriented. Teachers' narratives reveal gaps in pedagogical knowledge, often leading to misconceptions or inadequate instructional dispositions. Drawing on situated cognition theory, we discuss how internal factors, including exam-driven teaching and workplace conditions, shape science instruction. Based on these findings, we propose recommendations to enhance science teaching practices.
References
Aarts, H., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). Preface. In H. Aarts & A. J. Elliot (Eds.), Goal directed behavior (pp. 7–8). Psychology Press.
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Adu-Boateng, S., & Goodnough, K. (2022). Examining a science teacher’s instructional practices in the adoption of inclusive pedagogy: A qualitative case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(3), 303-325.
Altan, S., Lane, J. F., & Dottin, E. (2019). Using habits of mind, intelligent behaviors, and educational theories to create a conceptual framework for developing effective teaching dispositions. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 169-183.
Ansari, A. N., & Asad, M. M. (2024). Role of school leaders in cultivating professional learning communities and culture in Pakistani schools: An exploratory case study. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 9(2), 135-153.
Bhutta, S. M., Rizvi, N. F. (2022). Assessing teachers’ pedagogical practices and students’ learning outcomes in science and mathematics across primary and secondary school level: A nationwide study (2018-21). Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development, Karachi, Pakistan., 1-4.
Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., & Granger, E. M. (2009). No silver bullet for inquiry Making sense of teacher change following an inquiry‐based research experience for teachers. Science Education, 93(2), 322-360.
Borko, H., Liston, D., & Whitcomb, J. A. (2007). Apples and fishes: The debate over dispositions in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(5), 359-364.
Borko, H., Livingston, C., & Shavelson, R. J. (1990). Teachers' thinking about instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 40-49.
Buxton, C. A., Salinas, A., Mahotiere, M., Lee, O., & Secada, W. G. (2013). Leveraging cultural resources through teacher pedagogical reasoning: Elementary grade teachers analyze second language learners' science problem-solving. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 31-42.
Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49, 1-23.
Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607-651.
Eitam, B., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). Motivation in mental accessibility: Relevance of a representation (ROAR) as a new framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1751- 9004.2010.00309.x
Enderle, P., Dentzau, M., Roseler, K., Southerland, S., Granger, E., Hughes, R., ... & Saka, Y. (2014). Examining the influence of RETs on science teacher beliefs and practice. Science Education, 98(6), 1077-1108.
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882.
Gage, N. L. (2009). A conception of teaching. New York, NY: Springer.
Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944-963.
Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944-963.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hamachek, D. (1999). Effective teachers: What they do, how they do it, and the importance of self-knowledge. In Lipka., P. R. & Brinthaupt M. T. The role of self in teacher development, (pp. 189–224). New York, NY: SUNY Press.
Hennessy, S. (2006). Integrating technology into teaching and learning of school science: a situated perspective on pedagogical issues in research. Studies in Science Education 42(1), 1-48, DOI: 10.1080/03057260608560219
Huang, X., & Cribbs, J. (2017). Examples as an instructional tool in mathematics and science classrooms: teachers’ perceptions and attitudes. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 12(4), 374-390.
Hutner, T. L., & Markman, A. B. (2016a). Proposing an operational definition of science teacher beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 675-691.
Hutner, T. L., & Markman, A. B. (2016b). Department‐level representations: a new approach to the study of science teacher cognition. Science Education, 100(1), 30-56.
Hutner, T. L., & Markman, A. B. (2017). Applying a goal‐driven model of science teacher cognition to the resolution of two anomalies in research on the relationship between science teacher education and classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 713-736.
Hutner, T. L., Petrosino, A. J., & Salinas, C. (2021). Do preservice science teachers develop goals reflective of science teacher education? A case study of three preservice science teachers. Research in Science Education, 51, 761-789.
Hutner, T. L., Sampson, V., Chu, L., Baze, C. L., & Crawford, R. H. (2022a). A case study of science teachers' goal conflicts arising when integrating engineering into science classes. Science Education, 106(1), 88-118.
Hutner, T. L., Sampson, V., Baze, C. L., Chu, L., & Crawford, R. H. (2022b). An exploratory study of the goals science teachers’ satisfy by integrating engineering core ideas and practices into the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 71-90.
Korthagen, F. (2017) Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0, Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387-405, DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
Lau, K.-C., & Lam, T. Y.-P. (2017). Instructional practices and science performance of 10 top-performing regions in PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 39, 2128–2149.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Levin, B. B., He, Y., & Allen, M. H. (2013). Teacher beliefs in action: A cross-sectional, longitudinal follow-up study of teachers' personal practical theories. The Teacher Educator, 48(3), 201-217.
Liou, P. Y. (2021). Students' attitudes toward science and science achievement: An analysis of the differential effects of science instructional practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 310-334.
Liou, P.-Y., & Ho, J. H. N. (2018). Relationships among instructional practices, students' motivational beliefs and science achievement in Taiwan. Research Papers in Education, 33, 73–88.
Markman, A. B. (2012). Knowledge representation. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 36–51). New York: Oxford University Press.
Markman, A. B., & Dietrich, E. (2000). In defense of representation. Cognitive Psychology, 40(2), 138–171
Mikeska, J. N., Shattuck, T., Holtzman, S., McCaffrey, D. F., Duchesneau, N., Qi, Y., & Stickler, L. (2017). Understanding science teaching effectiveness: examining how science specific and generic instructional practices relate to student achievement in secondary science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2594-2623.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. SAGE.
Özden, M. (2008). The effect of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching phases of matter. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 8(2), 633-645.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Reynolds, R. E., Sinatra, G. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1996). Views of knowledge acquisition and representation: A continuum from experience-centered to mind-centered. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 93–104.
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1-42.
Sato, M. (2014). What is the underlying conception of teaching of the edTPA?. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 421-434.
Sugano, S. G. C., & Mamolo, L. A. (2021). The Effects of Teaching Methodologies on Students' Attitude and Motivation: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 827-846.
Sweeney, A. E., & Paradis, J. A. (2004). Developing a laboratory model for the professional preparation of future science teachers: A situated cognition perspective. Research in Science Education, 34, 195-219.
Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). The influence of teachers’ attitudes and school context on instructional practices in integrated STEM education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 190-205.
Thompson, B., Rudick, C. K., Kerssen-Griep, J., & Golsan, K. (2018). Navigating instructional dialectics: Empirical exploration of paradox in teaching. Communication Education, 67(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1388527
Tiilikainen, M., Toom, A., Lepola, J., & Husu, J. (2019). Reconstructing choice, reason and disposition in teachers’ practical theories of teaching (PTs). Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 124-136.
Waters‐Adams, S. (2006). The Relationship between Understanding of the Nature of Science and Practice: The influence of teachers’ beliefs about education, teaching and learning, International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 919-944, DOI: 10.1080/09500690500498351
Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702-739.
Wong, S. S., & Luft, J. A. (2015). Secondary science teachers’ beliefs and persistence: A longitudinal mixed-methods study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(7), 619-645.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sadia Muzaffar Bhutta, Afaq Ahmed, Sohail Ahmad, Aisha Naz Ansari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) [year] [author]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Call for Special Issue Proposals 
