A mixed-methods study of school students as trendsetters on co-designing 3D-printed kits for interdisciplinary STEM education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/8fm2hb34Keywords:
3D printing, gifted students, mixed methods, peer mentoring, STEM education, student as trendsetterAbstract
Secondary students in Malaysia turn away from STEM partly because the curriculum content is abstract and disconnected from real life. This mixed-methods study evaluated a Student-as-Trendsetter framework in which 10 gifted students codesigned 3D-printed STEM kits and mentored 88 peers. The classroom participants highly rated the peer-led sessions (M = 4.14–4.57), including the trendsetters’ expertise (M = 4.35). The trendsetters’ self-rated technical competency decreased significantly after the project (from 4.30–4.90 to 1.80–3.00; p < .001). Reflective journals showed that this decline was a healthy recalibration: moving from digital design to physical fabrication exposed real engineering constraints and built grounded, resilient confidence. The framework offers a low-cost route to engaging in student-led STEM learning.
References
Abu Hassan, M. H., Kaco, H., Mohd Noor, K., Mohd Alwi, N. H., Othman, S. S., Md Jusoh, S. N., & Muzaffar, N. A. Z. (2025). STEM-focused green service learning: Enhancing interactive learning and sustainability with INAQ. Journal of Islamic Social Sciences and Humanities, 32(2).
Belcheva, K. I. (2024). Learners as digital content creators in educational settings. In Proceedings of the ELARA Conference: Techniques & Technologies to Support Sustainable Education in the Academic Sphere (Book 2, Vol. 2, pp. 78–87).
Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1518602. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602
Bhatt, B. S. (2026). What drives active learning engagement in school education: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.32674/0ad5ck56
Chong, S., Pan, G. T., Chin, J., & Show, P. L. (2018). Integration of 3D printing and Industry 4.0 into engineering teaching. Sustainability, 10(11), Article 3960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113960
Dawkins, R., & Naidu, K. (2026). A surprising problem that emerges for humanities academics teaching STEM to communication students. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(4), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.32674/mqa8rk82
Deming, D. J., & Noray, K. (2020). Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and STEM careers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4), 1965–2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa021
Faizal Azli, A. U., Khairul Anhar, N. A. H., Kaco, H., Sajab, M. S., Mohd Idris, F., Mohamad Jan, N., & Mohd, S. M. (2024). Crafting mathematical minds by engaging Braille-tangible 3in1 3D printed geoboards module for visually impaired children. Semarak International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Mathematics, 1(1), 1–12.
Foi, L. Y., & Kean, T. H. (2022). STEM education in Malaysia: An organizational development approach? International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, 29(1), 1–19.
Gamal, M., Ibrahim, O. A., Hamed, H. F. A., & Abd-Elnaby, S. F. M. (2024). Engineering’s next leap: How Fourth Industrial Revolution is shaping the future of the industry. ERU Research Journal, 3(2), 970–992. https://doi.org/10.21608/erurj.2024.245917.1086
Hisyam, I. M., Salleh, M. F. M., & Nasir, N. A. M. (2019). The issues and challenges in empowering STEM on science teachers in Malaysian secondary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13), 430–444.
Izharruzzahir, N. N., Khairil Anhar, K. I. B., Abdu Rahman, T. N., Mohd Idris, F., Sajab, M. S., & Kaco, H. (2026). Bridging the gap in STEM education by visualizing physics concepts with 3D printing. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 43(1), 183–192.
Jin, R., Narayanan, G., Majid, S., & Lin, C. (2024). Exploring the application of mind map to enhance students’ creative thinking. International Journal of Service Management and Sustainability, 9(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijsms.v9i2.24210
Kakarla, U. (2024). Fostering creativity in education. International Journal of Innovative Scientific Research, 2(3), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.5281/ijisr140724
Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Sellami, A., & Abdelkader, N. (2022). A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: Trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7
Khadka, J., Joshi, D. R., Khanal, B., & Adhikari, K. P. (2026). Effect of learners’ self-efficacy on their learning performance at secondary schools in Nepal. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.32674/0m98t215
Klimecká, E. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of being ‘gifted’: Perceptions of the label by gifted pupils. Research Papers in Education, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2022.2065523
Klimecká, E. (2024). Educational strategies leading to labeling the gifted pupil. The Curriculum Journal, 35(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.222
Minh, Đ. (2026). AI-assisted learning and the illusion of competence: Measuring the AI-learning gap through random knowledge verification. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(4), 45–82. https://doi.org/10.32674/nrmwyw65
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2026). Ringkasan Eksekutif Rancangan Pendidikan Malaysia 2026-2035 Ringkasan Eksekutif Rancangan Pendidikan Malaysia 2026-2035. https://www.moe.gov.my/dokumen-ringkasan-eksekutif-rancangan-pendidikan-m
Mohd Rozi, N. S., Hamdan, M. N., Mohd Naim, A. M., Sajab, M. S., & Kaco, H. (2025). Physicochemical properties of reforming the recycled biobased polylactic acid (PLA) filament into film-liked shape. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3271(1), Article 060016. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0218765
Munir, M. T., Jamwal, P. K., Li, B., Carter, S., & Hussain, S. (2025). Revolutionising engineering pedagogy: The role of 3D printing in modern engineering education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(2), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2346554
Noreen, G. D., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2025). In their own voice: Educational perspectives from intellectually precocious youth as adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 69(4), 307–332.
Palpanadan, S. T., & Ravana, V. (2022). Future trajectories in teaching-learning practices for STEM education in Malaysian secondary schools: A scoping review. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 9(1), 169–170.
Parmar, J. S., Mistry, S. K., Micheal, S., Dune, T., Lim, D., Alford, S., & Arora, A. (2025). Peer support for improving student engagement and learning outcomes in postgraduate public health and health sciences: A qualitative study. Education Sciences, 15(5), Article 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050602
Pokhrel, V. (2022). From textbooks to beyond textbooks in English class: An action research study. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 3(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v3i1.577
Rumjaun, A., & Narod, F. (2025). Social learning theory—Albert Bandura. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81351-1_5
Saat, R. M., & Fadzil, H. M. (2022). Enhancing STEM education in Malaysia through scientist–teacher–student partnerships (STSP). In M. M. H. Cheng, C. Buntting, & A. Jones (Eds.), Concepts and practices of STEM education in Asia (pp. 125–142). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2596-2
Shahali, E. H. M., Ismail, I., & Halim, L. (2017). STEM education in Malaysia: Policy, trajectories and initiatives. Asian Research Policy, 8(2), 122–133.
Stager, G. S. (2025). Papert, parables, and the future of constructionism: A constructionist call for action. Constructionism Conference Proceedings, 8, 427–436. https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/82.X
Tabassum, R., Iqbal, S., Haneef, A., Yaseen, M., Tahira, R., Rasheed, K., Taj, S., & Ahmed, M. (2024). Impact of STEM education on creativity of university students. Kurdish Studies, 12(5), 673–678. https://doi.org/10.53555/ks.v12i5.3299
Tejera, M., Galiç, S., & Lavicza, Z. (2025). 3D modelling and printing in teacher education: A systematic literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-025-00147-2
To, T. T., Al Mahmud, A., & Ranscombe, C. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of 3D printing integration into engineering education in developing countries. Educational Technology & Society, 27(4), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202410_27(4).RP11
Ukoba, K., Yoro, K. O., Adeoye, A. E., Ampah, J. D., Yusuf, A. A., Samuel, F. O., Ikelegbe, O. E., & Jen, T. C. (2025). Additive manufacturing in the energy sector and the fourth industrial revolution. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 10, 4625–4645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00931-3
Valquaresma, A. (2024). Creativity, agency and meaning-making: Unfolding developmental possibilities in twenty-first-century learning environments. In A. Valquaresma, L. Dantas de Paula, & T. K. Rodney (Eds.), Creativity and learning (pp. 85–104). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73393-2_5
Widiana, D. R., Syafiuddin, Sriwijayasih, I., Aju, I. R., Praharsi, Y., & Novianarenti, E. (2025). The use of the Wilcoxon signed rank test in analyzing the difference in test scores before and after digital marketing training. Jurnal Teknologi Maritim, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.35991/jtm.v8i2.73
Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Dixson, D. D. (2019). Gifted students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sufi Adriana Saiful Akla, Afiqah Umairah Faizal Azli, Nur Allesya Hana Khairul Anhar, Mohd Shaiful Sajab, Fadzidah Mohd Idris, Hatika Kaco

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




